TWiV 1348: Clinical update with Dr. Daniel Griffin
August 15, 202654 min · 9,217 words
Show notes
In his weekly clinical update, Daniel Griffin and Vincent Racaniello are troubled by the latest executive order changing routine childhood vaccine recommendations, the call for nominations to join the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices, West Nile virus transmission in South Carolina, a newly identified midge-transmitted virus sickening cattle, and development of a cold-chain free DPT vaccine, the national cyclospora and screwworm outbreaks,new s…
Highlighted moments
What we have here is a failure to communicate. And that's just... That's what we have here in the U.S., right? Is a failure to communicate.
Transcript
Introduction
0:00This Week in Virology, the podcast about viruses, the kind that make you sick.
0:10From Microbe TV, this is TWIV, This Week in Virology, episode 1348, recorded on August 13th, 2026. I'm Vincent Racaniello, and you're listening to the podcast all about viruses. Joining me today from New York, Daniel Griffin. Hello, everyone. Red bow tie. I should know this by now, but... No, this is one I probably don't wear that much because these are inflamed hepatocytes,
0:42so it's a generic hepatitis bow tie. Could be toxic metabolic, could be viral. Yeah, like alcoholic hepatitis. Could be alcoholic hepatitis. Wow. All right. Good. Equal opportunity bow tie. Exactly. So, all right, we're going to jump in. I was just re-watching this movie, introducing it to my son. I don't know if you're familiar with the movie Cool Hand Luke, Vincent? Oh, yeah. Okay. So, perhaps, well, there's a couple of famous lines, but perhaps the most famous line
1:15is Paul Newman as Cool Hand Luke. Actually, his sort of closing line, right? What we have here is a failure to communicate. And that's just... That's what we have here in the U.S., right? Is a failure to communicate. That just seemed so... I listened and I was like, he's talking about us. He's talking about what's going on. It's perfect. Yeah. Great movie, actually. Yeah. So, for some reason, that was super popular among my college friends back at college. So, I got to reach out to them and sort of find out, why do we
1:48like that movie so much? So, perhaps we can speculate. But let's jump in on the news. And
Childhood Vaccine Recommendations
1:55the first thing is, you know, and I went ahead, I read this executive order and the Delivering Gold Standard Childhood Vaccine Recommendations for Americans. This is executive orders. This executive order came out on August 10th, 2026. So, I thought a few excerpts, then you and I can talk a little. And then there's actually some different takes on this. So, we'll talk a bit. So, first, you know, actually, I'll leave it a link. People can go. It's not that long. I mean, these executive
2:26orders are not that long. I should probably go back and see what executive orders like over time, like whether they're always just these sort of one-pager things. But this is like the 14,000-something executive order that's come out in the U.S. So, these things, there's a lot of these out there. But the scientific – I'm just reading the executive order. I don't want people to think I'm agreeing with this as I read this. But we'll read the excerpts and then we'll discuss them. So, first, the scientific assessment also found that instead of implementing vaccination
2:59mandates, most peer nations maintain high childhood vaccination rates through public trust and education. In the United States, by contrast, individual states set mandatory vaccination requirements that children must meet to attend school. So – Is that correct, Daniel? Well, the interesting thing, I mean, you sort of – if this was in a vacuum, right, I would be like, oh my gosh, you're talking about how we need to actually start spending more money on education because – and I think like a perfect example would have been how certain countries
3:34approach the COVID vaccine, right? So, they – if anything, it was kind of a privilege. There was a lot of education involved. You reach sort of the same end, but people didn't feel like they were forced because, you know, if you remember the early days, right, people were fighting to like have whatever job they did considered like essential so that they could be first in line for the vaccine. So, you know, an approach that some countries have definitely used during COVID was basically to spend money on education, spend money building public trust. And then when people are educated
4:09and they actually understand, they're clamoring for the vaccine. So, that is – I kind of like the idea that – I know that this isn't where this is headed, but I would love if that was really the takeaway was, hey, we as the U.S. are now going to devote a portion of our public health budget to education about the benefits of vaccination. I think we have to realize up front before we go any further that everything said in this executive order is a lie. Everything. Yeah.
4:39Yeah. Okay. Yeah. I mean, you just start off with the concept that this is a scientific assessment. This is not a scientific assessment, right? There was that great recent interview. What was great about the interview was at one point, you know, one of these folks, you know, challenges the person interviewing them and says, well, you wouldn't understand this because you're not a scientist. And they respond back with, well, you're not a scientist either. Yeah. That was RFK Jr. on Dana Bush bash on CNN, right? Yeah. Yeah. I just thought that was a great response. Oh, you wouldn't understand because you're not a
5:13scientist. It was like, well, you know, neither are you. To call this gold standard is ridiculous. This is just nonsense because there is no gold standard science here. What the previous, the current vaccine recommendations is based on gold standard science. We don't call it that because it's obsequious, but this is not gold standard science. It's just a label they give to it so that people who don't know any better can think it's right. I think that's, yeah, these, these are like catch words. Yeah. These are these catch phrases where
5:44they're trying to basically challenge and say, you know, this other stuff, it's all, you know, the pharmaceutical companies and everyone's at cahoots trying to make money. And so, okay, next one, they say this, this, this whole idea of peer nations, nothing is like the U S okay. With 50 very different States, you cannot depend on public trust and education. You have to have school vaccination mandates. Otherwise it doesn't work. Yeah. So, okay. So that next he, he, well, it gets broken down into based on consultation with my advisors, um, and review of available
6:18scientific evidence. It's just kind of one of those and brings me back to the interview. So, so our president is reviewing the scientific evidence among all the other things that are going on. I mean, it's just, I can't imagine that that's really, um, you know, happening. There's no science basis for this executive order. It is not. Um, and then there, they break things down. Uh, now this is kind of, and this is, I think we'll spend a little time on that at the very end of this sort of breakdown where they're actually interesting enough. They actually talk
6:49about immunization recommended for all children, right? And it seems to be like, okay, we're just going to, a bunch of these ones seem to get a pass. It seems measles, mumps, rubella, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, uh, haemophilus influenza type B, pneumococcal disease, human papillomavirus, varicella. Basically there actually seems to be like, we've identified that these are, you know, essential recommended for all children. And then they're going to mention some others in different contexts. Um, but then they say, and this is, I think where it gets challenging,
7:21the gold standard childhood vaccine recommendations also recognize that the combined measles, mumps, rubella, MMR vaccine should be administered in three separate single disease shots. Uh, once such products are domestically available and that to the maximum extent feasible, all childhood immunization should be administered at separate medical visits. This makes no sense. He's trying to cut down the number of shots. He's making more, and there's no scientific reason why you should break it up at all. No manufacturer is going to do
7:52this. Yeah. I think this is, this is a, this is a huge problem. Um, and it's really interesting, the timing too, right? Cause it's been sort of, you know, this is just want to point out, like, uh, don't feel like you're by yourself, even though like this, this particular, uh, lunatic fringe is very vocal is most Americans want their children protected. Most Americans do not want to see thousands of cases of measles. Most Americans do not want to see hundreds of children ending up in the hospital with what up until two years ago was a vaccine preventable illness, uh, measles I'm
8:27talking about. So this is the third time in less than a year. We read about this in the New York Times that president Trump has issued an executive order, um, that basically is targeting, um, vaccines and trying to undermine, um, vaccines in the United States. Um, so there's a nice, I actually, so I'll leave in a link to that New York Times, um, article, but I'm also going to leave in a link to this, uh, this, uh, article, this new news explainer article in the journal nature. Trump wants MMR
9:03vaccines split up the science behind why it's a bad idea. Numerous studies have shown that separating childhood jabs will delay protection and increase costs for families. Um, I kind of wish this wasn't behind a paywall. I mean, some of us subscribe to, uh, nature or have, you know, the ability to access it, but let's go through. When he signed the executive order, Trump, you ready for this, justified the change by stating that combined vaccines contain a dangerous amount of fluid. A vaccination is the
9:34size of a bottle of soda, he said. This is just so irresponsible, Daniel. Um, I mean, you've, you've gone, right? You, you've seen vaccines. You've gotten a vaccine. Was there, was there like a bottle of soda injected into you? No, this is no reality. This guy thinks that he's on a reality show and, and can lie. This is ridiculous. I mean, this is serious business we're talking about. There's no bottle of soda.
10:01I'm just shocked. I'm just shocked that, uh, yeah. I mean, most vaccines are about a half a mil, right? It's a tiny amount. Yeah. Yeah. That's about it. Yeah. It's about a half a milliliter. It's a tiny size. I mean, we've seen these. We, I think with our own eyes, you know, we are not injecting children with bottles of soda, you know, worth of fluid. Um, the other, and this seems just, you know, it can't, it can't get away from this is when signing the order, Trump falsely suggested again, a link between vaccines and autism. And we have repeatedly basically pointed out that
10:35that's not true. The people that say it's true are in it for, you know, the ability to make money. Um, the original claims came out of a guy who was basically committing fraud to try to make himself money off a, off a suit. Um, so yeah, there, there's nothing. And, and repeatedly, we've even talked about the fact that people say, oh, well, maybe I'll just wait a little till my child's a little older because I just want to be on the safe side. The safe side is not to wait, not to leave children exposed and vulnerable. And not only your children, but we live in a
11:07community now where if you're going to have a baby, if you're going to have that baby under the age of one, how safe is it to go out in this world now that we're having these diseases come back? All right. Next are individual jabs available for kids in the United States. So the order instructs the country's top health officials to adopt its recommendations, but it does not have any inherent legal power. Putting the recommendations into practice, we require vaccine companies to manufacture jabs that target each illness individually, a process that could take years
11:41and cost hundreds of millions of dollars. And I think you pointed this out, Vincent, who's going to do this, right? In this sort of anti-vaccine climate, they're saying we would like you to invest hundreds of millions of dollars to produce these individual jabs. And then who knows like what, what the environment's going to be like once you've gone through like, you know, all the approval process. No, it's not happening. Merck, the manufacturer of MMRs said it would take 10 years and hundreds of millions of dollars and they're not doing it.
12:13Just poorly spent. Now the executive order aims to, I like this, better align the United States with vaccine practices elsewhere. So this is, this is a good one. Just, you know, I mean, there's a lot of, we say the U S is not like somewhere else, but maybe they want us to be like Afghanistan. So most well-resourced nations use the MMR jab, but some developing countries where measles is endemic, such as Afghanistan uses an individual measles vaccine. Now they like to bring up Japan. So let's talk about Japan. Now Japan switched from an MMR vaccine to individual ones in 1993 because of a
12:49problem with the specific mumps strain used in the combination jab. I should have left the link into Stanley Plotkin. It's got a nice little piece on, on mumps immunity. But anyway, overall vaccination rates plummeted in part because of a lack of public trusted immunization. Several outbreaks of the three diseases followed. 2001, for instance, of measles outbreak affected about 265,000 children. Uh, the country switched to a measles rubella vaccine in 2006 and in May approved its first
13:22MMR shot since 1993. So this is it for peer nations, right? That's it? Uh, I think, uh, I think maybe there's some sub-Saharan country that might use a single individual, like when there's an outbreak or instance, but yeah, there's, this is not, you know, using these individual shots is not something that pure nations are doing. I don't know. Thoughts before we move on? Well, you know, he has made, this is his third executive order on vaccine schedules. The last
13:54one was blocked by a judge. Yeah. Okay. Because it's not legal. Okay. And this is going to probably suffer the same fate. Someone, multiple entities will sue and a judge will block it because this is all nonsense based on nothing in reality. Yeah. I mean, it's also, I think you got to sort of ask yourself and maybe like our listeners and people they talk to can ask this question. Um, you know, this is this idea that this, this one man, that this federal government can have this incredible
14:27power, um, to basically, uh, take away access to life-saving preventive medication. And the whole idea, I mean, of this balance between states' rights and the federal government, the way it's set up is the federal government gives, gives us, gives us advice. It gives us guidance. It gives us expert opinion. Um, you know, maybe some of those things might affect, um, access to vaccines as far as, uh, you know, getting insurance companies and the rest to pay for them. But ultimately the vaccination
14:58decisions are at the state level. So this is really quite an overreach for the executive branch of our government trying to take away these choices for, from us at the state level. So normally what would happen is the ACIP of CDC would make vaccine recommendations, right? And then the states would decide whether to adopt them. Most of the time they did in the old days when the ACIP was respectable. Uh, but now, and then the CDC director has to sign off on the ACIP recommendations.
15:32Now it will be very interesting to see if the new CDC director supports this or says this is wrong and gets fired. That's, that's a challenge, right? That's going to be like the first test of the new CDC director. And there's a nice article. Because she said, you know, she was asked about this and she said, oh, they would never ask to put our children at risk. Well, they just have. So now what are you going to do about it? Yeah. She said, oh, this would never happen. They would never ask me to do something that would, would undermine, you know, the, the health of, uh, people here in the U.S.
16:05So here it is, here it is. Um, we'll see what happens, right? Cause this may not even make it to that point. There's the, the whole idea that, that, um, that, that vaccine, national vaccine advisory committee is going to, uh, make some recommendations. But the question, will, will that even come to fruition? Will those recommendations be made? Will, will the new director be in this position? And we're actually, we'll leave in a link actually, because there is this, uh, department of health and human services solicitation of nominations for membership on the national
16:35vaccine advisory committee. Oh, are you going to apply Daniel? I was thinking about it. No, thank you. I'll nominate you if you'd like. Well, feel, feel free to nominate me. I would definitely think about it, but I'm, it seems like this might not be the, the most, uh, pleasant experience, um, just with what's been going on in the last, uh, well, I think if you got on that committee, you wouldn't be able to do TWIV clinical update anymore. I'd probably have to stop. Yeah. So
17:05maybe TWIV clinical update is a better, better way to spend my days. I think so. So, all right,
West Nile Virus and Cattle Virus
17:12we've got some other stuff going on and I do want to point out, there's a lot of stuff going on. We can't cover it all, but a couple of things that I will mention is the West Nile virus outbreak in, in PD. The South Carolina Department of Public Health has confirmed a, uh, an outbreak of West Nile virus in, in the PD. What, what is the PD? Do you know what this is? I don't know. You'll have to Google that for me, but, um, yeah. It's a geographic region in Northeastern South Carolina,
17:43uh, named after the historic PD indigenous tribe. Okay. 10 to 12 counties centered on the great PD river watershed. Okay. Right. All right. And, uh, also this is kind of a interesting, uh, you know, mystery, but mystery being solved. Uh, newly discovered virus is sickening cattle in Western Europe. So when farmers in Switzerland and Southern Germany in June noticed that their cows were getting sluggish suffering from diarrhea and producing less milk than normal. Many at first
18:15assumed it might be an effect of the scorching heat wave holding Europe in its grip. Uh, but as more and more farms were affected, including some in Eastern France, researchers started to look for another cause after standard tests ruled out some likely suspect teams from the Friedrich Loeffler Institute in Germany and France's national research Institute for agriculture, food, environment, independently found the real culprit, a virus never seen in Europe before and likely transmitted by midges. So the latest of several such viruses to arrive in Europe the past five
18:47years. So the virus belongs to a large group called ortho bunya viruses, which caused many livestock diseases and a few human ones, including or a poochie fever. It's most closely related to and shares more than 90% of its genome with the Shamanda virus, a pathogen spread by midges that was first isolated from cattle in Nigeria in 1965. And it's been found across Africa as well as Japan.
19:16You remember Schmallenberg virus? It first arrived in Europe that spread by midges a number of years ago. Same thing, same idea. Yeah. Yeah. So those midges. And also, you know, it's interesting how, how do things get to, uh, Japan? I mean, there's a lot of, uh, you know, I won't call it trafficking, but I mean, it's trafficking, you know, cattle's being transported to different parts of the world.
Tetanus Vaccine Stability
19:36So, all right. And, uh, this is encouraging. This is an article in the Lancet. We have safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of SPVX02, a room temperature stabilized tetanus diphtheria vaccine, uh, compared to two established tetanus diphtheria booster vaccines, a multi-center, single-blind, randomized, first-in-human phase one trial in the UK. And, you know, here's like, why do we care? Because the, the cold chain requirement, um, has always been an issue with
20:10a lot of vaccines. So it limits vaccine accessibility. It limits our ability to deploy the vaccines. So this is a lyophilized, right? So it's basically dry, desiccated. It's a powder. Um, it's a fridge-free version of this tetanus diphtheria vaccine, stable for up to two years, um, up to temperatures of 30C. So it can get pretty darn hot. Um, and so this is a multi-center, first-in-human phase one, single-blind, randomized clinical trial, uh, conducted at three sites in the
20:41UK. Um, so really, you know, really encouraging here. Their findings suggest that this is safe, well-tolerated, uh, similar immunogenicity to the approved vaccines. Um, so exciting that we might have, uh, these, uh, room temperature, uh, vaccines. Right. That'd be great. Fantastic.
Cyclospora and Screw Worm Cases
21:01All right. Cyclospora chiatinensis. Um, there's a lot going on. Apparently there's a lot sort of political intrigue going, going on about food safety and who may have, may not get in favors in exchange for contributions, but we won't talk about that. We'll talk about the disease and the current numbers. As per the CDC, you'll see that these are lower than when we start adding the states, but the CDC has received reports of 13,895 lab confirmed cases. Um, at least 10,455 additional
21:34cases that they report require further investigation and analysis. Um, Michigan alone, total cases, 12,485. Um, 279 have ended up in the hospital. There've been a couple of deaths. Missouri, 1,577, New York city, 594. Um, but you can actually, if you, and I like the New York city because you can see that we seem to be, I mean, it's, it's August now. We should be kind of getting to the end of the cyclospora importation season, I guess. Um, but also a lot of, um, you
22:09know, some of the sources have been identified and some of that stuff's been pulled off the shelves. So do you know 40% of all the lettuce consumed in the U S is, comes from Taylor Farms? No, I didn't know that. Apparently. Is that all made in, grown in Mexico? So that's, that's really what you worry about is the Taylor Farms de Mexico, um, you know, where, where basically it gets contaminated and then it gets brought in and yeah. All right. Speaking of stuff that we're importing from, uh, from Mexico, I thought we were supposed to be importing less,
22:43right? And we have all these tariffs. Can't we tear up the parasites? Well, this is a screw worm. So we're up to a total of 45 cases. Um, and it really, it's down in that New Mexico, Southwest Texas area. Um, and there's a nice article published in EIS, human myiasis resulting from reemergence of cochleomaya hominoborax screw worm, Mexico, 2025, 2026. And so we read after its elimination from Mexico in 2003, 20 years ago, myiasis caused by new world screw worm
23:19has recently reemerged as a public and animal health concern. Uh, so these individuals conduct a retrospective study of human new world screw worm myiasis cases reported through Mexico's national surveillance system. Um, April 13, 2022 to March 14, 2026 of 204 cases in official surveillance summaries, 202 had sufficient, um, information for case level clinical and epidemiological analysis. Uh, remember this is humans. We're looking at humans. So human cases were concentrated
23:55in Southern Mexico. Most 72% occurred in men. Uh, mean patient age was 61 lower limbs, 55% were in the lower limbs. Um, now 77%. So about three quarters of these folks had, um, at least one, um, concurrent medical condition. So comorbidity, six deaths were reported among, um, these folks, but only one death was directly attributed to myiasis, but just the, just the horror of basically
24:28being eaten, um, alive by these, um, by these maggots. How would this cause death, Daniel? Um, so what ends up happening, um, and you know, let's say this person has diabetes or they have a neuropathy or something. Neuropathy is kind of the classic. So you've got a cut or scrape or an infection and then the maggots get in there and then they start eating the flesh. And basically you've got this, this open flesh that, uh, then, uh, bacteria get into, you end up with sepsis. Okay. So, yeah. Okay. So some interesting details, right? We'll go into this. Um, so the new world
25:02screw worm, um, is an obligate parasite during its orival stage. So adult female flies are attracted to blood, wounds, inflamed tissue, mucous membranes, natural body orifices where they deposit the eggs. And these eggs are going to hatch within 12 to 24 hours. So then the larvae are going to invade and immediately start feeding on living tissue for five to seven days, um, before they drop to the soil to continue development. Now, because the, uh, new world screw worm flies usually mate only once,
25:33um, we can do this mass release of a rated sterile flies to interrupt the reproduction. Um, and this sterile insect technique combined with quarantine and treatment of infested animals, um, actually supported eradication of new world screw worm from North America, southward, all the way to the Darien Gap. Um, after eradication North of Darien Gap, continued release was used to maintain this barrier. Um, but environmental conditions, including moderate to every rainfall, um, these pretty high
26:05temperatures, 35 C and above could really favor the new world screw worm development. Um, and they've got this, um, you actually see this graph where the number of cases down there in Mexico is actually rising. And they, yeah, yeah. So maybe we'll, if you're watching on YouTube, you'll actually see that, you know, it starts off with a trickle and then we're seeing, um, you know, really the number of cases rise. So this is the same parasite that causes the cattle screw worm disease. Yeah. The
26:36crazy thing here is like over 200 human beings, right. Getting, you know, and it doesn't take much and, you know, and you, you don't notice cause you know, you might not feel or, you know, so you can see it's all, you know, well, it sort of started in Southern Mexico, but it's starting to move. And as we're seeing it's, this has crossed the border. But in the U S have we seen human cases? So, so far, I don't think we've actually seen like someone in the U S get it in the U S and
27:07then, yeah, it's most, and it's mostly domestic, you know, uh, or domesticated. Most of this is in,
Ebola Outbreak and Vaccine Trials
27:12um, yeah, dogs and goats and sheep and cattle. Okay. Uh, Ebola, um, 4,449 confirmed cases over 2,000 confirmed deaths in the DRC. As we, yeah, 50%. Wow. Yeah. It's a high mortality, right? Yeah. And we even talked about, even if you survive, right, this is something where there's a post Ebola sequelae. A lot of these folks are not okay. Um, even if they survive. Yeah. Yeah. So what are we doing?
27:47Well, a couple of things. So, uh, we read in science, mismatched vaccine being rolled out against Ebola outbreak. So three separate studies have found that blood from people who received the vaccine contained antibodies that bind to the Bundabugio virus. So this is this, um, Urvibo. So the Urvibo vaccinated ferrets survived infection with Bundabugio, whereas control animals died within 10 days, three out of four vaccinated monkeys also survived the Bundabugio challenge versus only one of four control animals. Um, basically, uh, they, uh, this, this group has,
28:23uh, decided to, uh, support a phase three trial of this Urvibo in the DRC. So we're going to be seeing, uh, you know, multiple vaccine trials. Um, emergence of Bundabugio virus variant in 2026 outbreak in the, in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda. Um, and they've done phylogenetic analysis confirms cross-border transmission between the DRC and Uganda. But I will point out Uganda at this point, uh, you know, has done a really good job. So currently Ebola free and really doing a good job
28:55of protecting that border. Well, I hope this, this vaccine works well, because if it doesn't, then people are going to be reluctant to get any other vaccine in the future there, any other Ebola or Bundabugio specific vaccine.
29:11Yeah. Fingers crossed. I do hope it helps.
Measles Outbreak in Pennsylvania
29:14Barrets are not humans. Did you know? It's true. It's true. Yeah. All right. Now pretty upset when I saw like how much this number had risen, um, the number of measles cases. So over a hundred measles cases were added to the count just in this last block. If we look at the Johns Hopkins measles tracker, 2,484 cases so far this year. And I want to point out, um, you know, that's a number, right? And what is that? They say like, you know, big numbers or statistics, but, but one person, you know, is it tragedy? And so I just want
29:49to give that number some context. So 2,484 cases of measles. Now 10 to 20% of those folks end up in the hospital, not for quarantine, but because they're so sick. Um, and we, you know, and we, we've already had deaths for measles, which, you know, should not be happening, uh, in the United States. So think of this hundreds of little kids ending up in the hospital, struggling to breathe, um, because of this undermining of confidence in vaccines. And I just, you know, when you think about that, just try to, try to think about this medical freedom that everyone is talking about. Um, think
30:23about the medical freedom, um, you know, that you're taking away from that little baby who's now in the hospital and the medical freedom impact on the parents who now have a child in, in the hospital. Um, and then even if the child survives, makes it out of the hospital, the risk of them dying is, is increased for the next, uh, several years. And there's even the issue about problems down the road. So this is astounding because at one point, not too long ago, there was no measles in the U S so now this is all because of failure to vaccinate. And because
30:57people are not listening because the public health authorities are not telling them what to do. It's the opposite of not telling them what to do. I mean, one is they're misinforming them. Oh, this is all coming in from other, this is a worldwide problem. That's not true. This is measles spreading here in the United States. Um, basically if you say otherwise you're lying, right? And people are apparently as few folks who are happy to lie. I just cannot believe that politicians are okay with this happening under RFK jr. These are kids that are getting sick. I don't understand what they
31:31are thinking. Yeah. No, I mean, when someone brings this up, this is not, this is not okay. Let's have a fun discussion. There are hundreds of little kids are ending up in the hospital, struggling to breathe. We've had deaths. This is, this is not okay. Um, and as you know, point out, there's New York Times article, Kennedy stirred vaccine fears in Pennsylvania years before a measles outbreak. So to speech in Lancaster County, RFK mocked the threat of measles. Um, now local officials are racing to contain one of the largest outbreaks in the country. The groups facing these outbreaks
32:04were almost all religious communities that just don't vaccinate. He told CNN's Danabash. It's hard to blame that on me. He added, but what Mr. Kennedy failed to acknowledge is his own role and the role of children's health defense, the anti-vaccine group he once led in stirring distrust in these very communities. And that includes, uh, Lancaster, uh, which is now at the center of one of the largest measles outbreaks in the country. The state has reported dozens of hospitalizations, more than 230 cases. Um, a number of some local doctors continue to be considered to be a vast underestimate,
32:36uh, given that these, uh, communities often avoid traditional healthcare. Five years ago, Mr. Kennedy stood behind a wooden lectern on a farm in the county and delivered a warning to the local Amish community about the nation's public health agencies. Those agencies are going to do everything in their power to make the Amish vaccinated, he said, because they cannot stand the fact that you are healthy. A large crowd, 1,500 people, according to a local papers account, spilled out from under a white tent at the annual farming fair to hear from Mr. Kennedy, then the leader of children's health
33:10defense. He turned to measles, a disease that was so horrible. He joked that when he fell ill with it as a child, he had to stay home and watch TV the whole week. The audience erupted with applause and laughter. The cure for measles is chicken soup and vitamin A. He added every now and then Kennedy would be dragged in front of the camera and begrudgingly make some offhand positive comment about the MMR vaccine, but that's about the best you're going to get out of him. Yes, this one individual with no scientific background should not be leading this country's
33:43vaccine policy. Yeah. Folks, use your vote. Yeah, we really have to do something. I mean, this is a call to arms. We have children suffering, you know, that when you mix politics and medicine, you end up, yes, with hospitalized and dead children. All right, but there are things that
Influenza Treatment and Oseltamivir
34:01we can do. I mean, science has made this a better world for many of us that take advantage of this and for our children. And we have a nice article, Effectiveness of Oseltamivir in Hospitalized Children with Laboratory Confirmed Influenza 2014 to 2023, published in JAMA Pediatrics. You know, and I think sometimes Tamiflu, Oseltamivir, gets sort of a bad rap. We wish we had something that was more effective. But this is pretty impressive, actually, when you look at the data here. So this cohort study used data that was obtained from the Influenza Hospitalization Surveillance Network,
34:36FluServeNet. It looks at influenza hospitalizations across all ages, 13 states. The primary outcome was time from symptom onset to ICU admission, and they also looked at length of stay. So you've got 6,044 cases in the ICU analysis, 70% get Tamiflu or Oseltamivir. 7,103 in the length of stay secondary analysis, 80.9% got Oseltamivir. Now, in the ICU analysis, remember, these are little kids.
35:08The median age was 3. About half of them were male. 49% had one or more medical comorbidity. 51% did not. And if they did have a comorbidity, the most common one was asthma. It's about a quarter of the kids, right? So half the kids with comorbidities, half without. Compared with untreated children, the folks that got the Tamiflu, the Oseltamivir, 31% reduced risk of ending up in the
35:39ICU. And there was also a shortened length of stay for the folks that got the Tamiflu. And they did a nice job. You can go through, they've got these nice far spots where they look at, you know, different variables. They even analyze, like, getting it right away. What if you wait a little and still get it? Really looked like just getting it, you know, earlier, of course, is better, right? We've seen that many times. But really, sort of a call to arms to make sure that these children don't miss the potential benefit of getting an antiviral.
36:11So was the protection of the hazard of ICU admission, was that across the children with and without comorbidities? Yes, yes. Okay. That's good. Yeah. No, excellent. Keep getting more and more good data on the RSV vaccine and the monoclonals. The nice thing too, right? I thought this was nice, and I haven't included a link to the article, but I just think it's pretty straightforward. You know, if your kid doesn't get RSV, if they don't end up with this particular respiratory infection, there's such a tendency
36:44when you take them to a provider for them to get antibiotics, that we're starting to also see that we're reducing the exposure of these kids to all these antibiotics, which is just great in and
COVID-19 Trends and Monoclonal Antibodies
36:54of itself. Okay. COVID. Ah, then send. I'm starting to see things go up. Yeah. Yeah. That's it. We lost. Yeah. Too bad. Yeah. Starting to rise here at the beginning. And it really kind of, California is already up to moderate. Kentucky is already up to moderate. I don't know what's going on there in Alaska and the Virgin Islands, but it's at high already. Yeah. So we'll keep an eye on that. I'm a little concerned that this is the beginning. If this goes anything like last year, this will continue until the end of October.
37:31Yeah. It's kind of interesting, right? I mean, that was sort of, yeah, that was kind of the pattern. It was late, right? Like right around beginning of August, end of July, you started to see it and it really shot up, right? And so September, you had to, yeah. And then right away in mid-November, it starts to go back up again. So you really don't get much of a break. No. No. Like we've had, we've had a good break since like April. Yeah. So it might be kind of get that vaccine early when they come out here, you know, because it looks like we're going
38:01to be right into it. So. All right. And this, this is interesting because I think that this article I'm going to talk about here in the COVID section is more broadly relevant than just COVID. And so this is an article that was published in the Journal of Infectious Disease. The article Impact of COVID-19 Monoclonal Antibody Therapy on Subsequent Vaccine-Elicited SARS-CoV-2 Immune Responses. I'm going to have some questions, criticisms, comments, but basically these
38:31researchers were asking this question. Like, so you go ahead and you get the monoclonal antibodies and then later you get a vaccine. And so is this going to impact the monoclonal antibodies? Will that impact your subsequent vaccine responses? So they conduct this prospective phase four, um, open label study of adults who got, um, either the Moderna or the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine. Um, and you've got this first cohort, which is folks have acute COVID and they either get the monoclonal antibodies. They're randomized, previously randomized to
39:03monoclonal antibodies, camostat or placebo is part of active two. And then you have a second cohort cohort cohort two. And these are unvaccinated adults without reported prior COVID-19. Um, and they're analyzed, um, and they're going to measure the, the binding of the IgG, the neutralizing antibodies, spike specific memory B cells, CD4 positive, CD8 positive T cells, and then get a baseline in, in a few different time points. 43 participants were analyzed. Um, at day 140,
39:38the neutralizing antibody titers were lower among prior monoclonal antibody recipients and COVID-19 naive participants than among placebo chemostat recipients and those with evidence of prior infection. The, uh, receptor binding domain specific, those RBD specific, but not spike specific memory B cells were reduced after prior monoclonal antibody therapy at days 56 and 140. Um, frequency of spike specific CD4 positive and CD8 positive T cells did not differ by prior monoclonal antibody
40:11exposure. So interesting. It does look like prior anti-SARS COVID-2 monoclonal antibody treatment limits the endogenous RBD focused B cell response to later mRNA vaccination, uh, but doesn't really affect a T cell immunity. Um, what I thought was interesting, what I kind of wanted to know is about timing, right? Cause we talk about like, okay, you know, this is, this is going to get you through that. This was back as we saw in the early days, 80% reduction in ending up in the hospital or dying.
40:41Um, but then later on, not, you're going to get vaccinated. If we wait three months, if we wait six months, I'd love to see like, if there was a timing of vaccination that might, uh, somehow give you the protection we're hoping to get. So sort of leave that as an open. All right. Now, last article we're going to talk about before we get to emails. Um, and this is the article clinical practice guideline for long COVID prevention and treatment published in the European respiratory journal. Um, and I have to say, this is more than just a practice guideline. Um, it's an open access article
41:15that reviews the different approaches to prevention and treatment of long COVID. And it's what I love the evidence for and against each potential intervention. So you go through these tables and you see, you know, what is the potential intervention? What's the data you can go through the links and look at the individual articles. So here, a multidisciplinary working group was established and comprised 60 members from 10 countries, 10 areas of expertise with a strong background in long COVID research, clinical practice, methodology of guideline development through a
41:47two-step process. They determined eight PICO population intervention, comparative outcome questions. Um, this is like a way you kind of go through and do these. Um, after they search the literature, uh, they end up with three rounds of the Delphi survey, uh, kind of joke about the Delphi survey, right? As we get a bunch of experts in the room and they breathe in the vapors and they reach a consensus. Um, but they, uh, the guideline presented 10 specific recommendations, each supported
42:17by existing updated or newly conducted, uh, systematic reviews. Um, some of the ones I think our listeners will not be surprised by, um, you want to prevent it, right? So suggestion of getting vaccinated or the use of antiviral agents during the acute phase, um, of COVID-19. Um, but then they talk about things that do and don't work. Um, so I'm going to leave in a link it's open access. Um, and so, um, not, not a bad resource. Vaccination and antivirals are up there. Yeah. That's like number
42:50one, right up there. Like get vaccinated, try not to get COVID, get early treatment. So, yeah. All right.
Parasites Without Borders Fundraiser
42:57Well, as we've been saying for quite a while, no one is safe until everyone is safe. Um, we have moved into, I think it's our most exciting of the year fundraiser. You may think it's the microbe TV one that comes in November, January, but this year we're doing our fundraiser for ASTM and H because we're actually doing a big tribute to Dixon Day-Pommier. Uh, we're going to do a five-year lecture series. Uh, we're going to announce this at the annual, um, ASTM and H, uh, meeting so that we're going to, uh, support the president's, um, meeting that's going to be announcing this. Uh,
43:32so we're, we're hoping to get up to a maximum donation of a hundred thousand dollars. So go to parasiteswithoutborders.com, click on the donate button and help us reach our goal.
Listener Questions and Wastewater Tracking
43:41It's time for your questions for Daniel. You can send yours to Daniel at microbe.tv. John writes, I wonder if oil and vinegar neutralizes cyclospora. We hear about cases that seem to stem from places like Taco Bell that aren't exactly serving up tossed salads. And of course, there are a lot of other consideration like uniformly tossing the dressing, but if it does, it might be a way of being able to enjoy a salad with some level of comfort.
44:12What about ranch dressing? Wasn't that a, wasn't that a big hit? Uh, everyone who came to watch the, uh, the, the, the football, they, they went home with, uh, you know, travel size ranch. Maybe the ranch will get it off. No, I mean, it would be great if, if the vinegar and oil would neutralize the cyclospora, but unfortunately it doesn't, as we've talked about it really hard to get it off. Um, so yeah. All right. Robin writes, I'm a long-term TWIV listener. Wanted to pass along something I thought might be of interest, particularly given your comments about the need for more testing
44:45for MPOX a while back. Cgene USA recently received FDA emergency use authorization for the all-plex HSV-1 and 2 VZV MPXV assay. It's a multiplex real-time PCR assay authorized for the simultaneous qualitative detection and differentiation of MPXV HSV-1 and 2 and VZV from lesion swab specimens in individuals suspected of viral infection consistent with MPOX. I work for Cgene,
45:17so a full disclosure here, but I'm not reaching out to pitch anything. I simply thought this was a relevant development given the conversations you've had around MPOX testing and diagnosis. Yeah, no, I think this is great. I mean, I always say like, you know, physicians are limited by, um, the tests they have access to because we're, we're not always right. You know, our clinical ideas, uh, need to have, uh, that redirection, um, of a lab to tell us like, is this, and, um, as we've seen from a number of these studies, even physicians that feel like they're experienced and think they know what
45:51the diagnosis is, um, often surprised when a result comes back. So. Daniel writes, it's almost, it's been almost a week since my wife and I woke to a bat in our bedroom. We heard some ticking, turned on the light, and there was a bat flying around. We got our door closed and called animal control. They came, they couldn't find the bat. Then we called a private company. They came and couldn't find the bat. So we proceeded to our local ER for pep. We completed our two shots yesterday, second shot yesterday. I was in no mood to hear all about the parasites of food
46:26handlers in New York city. We visit my son in Brooklyn next week, and he says he has some great international restaurants he wants to take us to. And to make matters worse, I learned from you that my taking the polio sugar cube prior to contracting measles in 1963 could be a problem. Thanks a lot for spooking me, Dr. Griffin. Should I look to score some ivermectin? I'm going to wait to see if we start getting some polio in North Carolina before I get another shot. But my main reason for writing is to let you know the CDC score for COVID score for wastewater is defined as a categorical score.
47:02I think the data analytics folks somehow came up with this number. There are no units attached to it. North Carolina has a very good respiratory viruses website, which tracks flu, RSV, COVID, and a category of just respiratory illness. Hospitalizations and ER visits are tracked, and they correlate quite well with the wastewater data from previous weeks. The wastewater testing is fairly extensive, but does miss some areas, mainly in the southern rural areas. I believe that all hospitals are required to track respiratory admissions and ER visits. I appreciate your show.
47:38I watch it regularly and thus am typically the smartest guy in the room. All right. This is awesome. There's so much in your email here, right? I mean, we could have like an hour discussion of each. I mean, the first is the bat, right? That's the tough thing about bats is that bats have these tiny razor sharp teeth. And so a lot of times you don't even know if you've been bitten or not. So this whole idea of you wake up in a bedroom and there's a bat, a bat may have bit you in your sleep. And there was, unfortunately, it was a case about a young
48:08boy who died up in Canada recently. And it was, you know, I think it was sleeping in a barn or something. It was a bat. They thought there was no issue. And then later this, the boy ends up dying of rabies. Some people do these cost analysis about, you know, what should you do? But yeah, I think that if that's you, you did the right thing. You go to your local ER, you get your post-exposure prophylaxis. There is a bit of a discussion about, do you get the RIG, the rabies immune globulin, right? Because that vaccine is going to take a while to start working, right? So if it's
48:41within the first week of getting the vaccine, right? So once you get the vaccine, seven days later, you're good to go. But that first seven days, you're kind of unprotected. So we often give RIG as well. Recently had an episode where I got involved recently as in this week. It was mom, it was dad, it was a two-year-old and they wake up and there's a bat and then the bat's gone. You know, where'd the bat go? Well, the bat went out the same way it came in. And so usually they have a way of access through an attic or something. So you want to get animal control. You want to have
49:13them figure out like what potential access points to keep that from happening. All right, next, measles, 1963. You got it after your sugar cube, you know. No, well, sugar cube was 1962. So I guess it's possible. Yeah. So you got it. I guess he gets sugar cube in 62 and then he gets his measles in 63, right? Yeah. So yeah, it's interesting. Like we've talked about the concern there. Now the WHO has not made like a recommendation. Like, you know, just think about people in this scenario,
49:44should they all be getting, and we've definitely talked about the concerns. So sort of leave that out there, but it's good to just let people know that people are starting to talk about this. People are starting to think about this. And yeah, there is this concern that if you get measles after your vaccine-preventable illnesses, do you have the protection you think you had? Yeah. You know, I think you're joking about the ivermectin. Yes. Go enjoy those international, you know, eating opportunities when you come to visit New York.
50:20Charles writes, now that it looks like we will be able to get an mRNA flu vaccine, what would you recommend for Dr. Racaniello? I am almost as old as Dr. Racaniello and am leaning towards the high-dose flu vaccines. So Charles, you know, right now it's going to be 50 to 64, right? So, you know, some of us like myself are kind of in that zone, so I'll probably pick the mRNA flu vaccine. We're basically waiting to see about the 65 and over because that's going to be a different comparator. Like, okay, so this
50:54is better than the standard-dose flu. How does it compare to the high-dose or the different flu vaccinations recommended for the 65 and over? At least at this point until we find out the answer to that. Plan early, right? Because we've talked about a lot of times you might have issues accessing the senior flu shots. So plan early, call around. Clearly, it's better than the standard when you look head-to-head. We'll have to find out how the mRNA stands up to the high-dose.
51:24So it says it has accelerated approval with ongoing post-marketing studies. So what does that mean, Daniel? What is accelerated? Can I get it or not? I think so. You'll, you know, the way we'll know and we'll keep track of this, you'll keep track of this. You go in, you know, your CVS, your Rite Aid or whatever, and then see if it allows you to kind of click the box. So I would get, I want the mRNA vaccine because I think it's better than the old one, but I never was able to get the high-dose because it's always out by the time I go. So I'll just try the mRNA vaccine, right?
51:58Sounds good. Yeah. Peter writes, looking at the wastewater graph, someone asked, what does the two mean? Good question. I asked the same question to Gemini AI. The answer is attached. It's quite complicated. All right. So here's, I'll briefly tell you the answer from AI. Transforming a raw sewage sample into a smooth trend line on a public health dashboard involves a multi-step pipeline. The process converts raw molecular signals like genetic material,
52:28into standard per capita metrics normalized for rain dilution and population shifts. So first you get a sample, right? You concentrate it, you extract the nucleic acid, then you do either quantitative PCR and you get a cycle threshold or you do digital PCR where you get an absolute count of viral gene targets. Then they convert the droplet or cycle count into a physical volume concentration by accounting for dilutions and so forth. So this produces a unit, a number in units like gene copies
53:04per liter or gene copies per gram. Then they normalize for rain and sewage composition. I didn't actually know this, but you know, raw concentrations fluctuate widely due to non-biological factors like rainfall, industrial discharge, groundwater infiltration. So they have ways of normalizing for that. Then they scale to the population, right? To compare different sewer sheds or cities. Total daily viral loads are divided by the estimated population served by the plant. And that gives you a standardized unit
53:38such as gene copies per person per day. And then the single day wastewater points are noisy due to sample variance. And so they have to calculate seven or 15 day rolling averages, apply linear regressions to fit a smooth trend line. And then they plot it on the graph. Okay. So that's how it's a lot. It's a lot involved there. A lot involved there. But as you heard from, from Daniel, not Daniel Griffin, but Daniel above, um, the two, the units don't mean, say mean anything. Okay. They're, they're categorical score.
54:13So if you're looking at just the numbers, it's one thing, but in this case, what, um, Peter has done is to explain the graphs and that's something different. Okay. Very cool. Thank you. That's TWIV weekly clinical update with Dr. Daniel Griffin. Thank you, Daniel. Thank you. And everyone be safe. Thank you.