LLMs Will Never Make Art With Caleb Wilson and Arif Hasan
September 2, 202642 min · 9,552 words
Show notes
In this week’s Better Offline, Ed Zitron is joined by Arif Hasan of Wide Left and Caleb Wilson of Kill The Computer to talk about an academic paper on AI slop, and the many reasons why LLMS can never truly make art. Why Slop Matters: Arif Hasan wideleft.football x.com/ArifHasanNFL arif.bsky.social Caleb Wilson Please support me by subscribing to my premium newsletter - here’s $10 off your first year of annual: YOU CAN NOW BUY BETTER OFFLINE MER…
Highlighted moments
at one point he says, this is the only, uh, human created, uh, endeavor that I would deny the title art.
Transcript
Welcome and introductions
0:00This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed Human. Healthcare can feel complicated. That's why Optum uses technology to connect the people and processes that make healthcare easier, more affordable, and more effective. We're making it clearer for you to know exactly what your benefits cover. And to help you better manage your health, we're coordinating care between your doctors and your technology. We believe better, simpler healthcare is always possible. That's healthy optimism.
0:30That's Optum. Visit Optum.com to learn more. Amazon Pharmacy presents Painful Thoughts. Of course I see my coworker in light at the pharmacy. Can he tell I'm picking up prescription hemorrhoid cream? I'm probably standing weird. Why is he smiling? He knows. He's going to call me Hemorrhoid Lloyd tomorrow. I know it. I've got to quit my job. Next time, avoid awkward conversations and get fast-free delivery with Amazon Pharmacy.
1:01Healthcare just got less painful. Nothing quite pops like the fun freeze-dried crunch of M&M's Popped Caramel. Except maybe a pop concert performed live with you and a friend in the crowd. That's why M&M's Popped Caramel is teaming up with iHeart Radio, who's giving away a trip for two to the iHeart Radio Music Festival in Vegas this September. Enter for your chance to win at iHeartRadio.com slash MMS. M&M's. It's more fun together. Available at your local retailer. No purchase necessary. Ends 8-20-2026. Must be 18 plus.
1:3150 U.S. and D.C. resident only to enter. See official rules at iHeartRadio.com slash MMS.
1:36Now at Lowe's. Faster quotes. Start at the Lowe's Pro Desk. Got a material list handwritten on a sticky note or saved as a photo? Perfect. Bring it to us and get a quote in minutes. And if you don't see what you need on the shelf, we'll help you get it. You can access thousands of products beyond what's available in-store or on Lowe's.com, right from the Lowe's Pro Desk. Build quotes faster and source the materials you need to keep your jobs moving. Just like that at Lowe's.
2:06CallZone Media. Bonjour, I am Ed Zitron and welcome to this week's Better Offline.
2:26I'm back at it. Download the newsletter. Subscribe to the premium. God damn, I need the money. After all, I need to make a big gold anvil to drop on my head at the end of the AI bubble. And of course, if you're not on YouTube, please subscribe on the YouTube. Please, I need you to do that immediately. Give me some Imodium because I have the diarrhea of a CEO. And today I am joined by Kill the Computers' Caleb Wilson. How are you doing, Caleb? Doing fantastic. Thanks for having me. My pleasure. And how are you doing? Arif Hassan of White Left. Doing terribly, as always.
The Why Slop Matters paper
2:56Wonderful. Today we have two illustrious subjects because Caleb delivered us a paper. I was going to say, I'd call it that. It's literally an academic paper called Why Slop Matters. And these are some of the names. Cody Comers, Yaman Du, Julia Gordon, Normal, Ari Holtzman, Normal, Tess McNulty, Spencer Stewart, Lindsay Thomas, Richard Jean Soen, Hoyt Long. A bunch of people who work at university. Hoyt Long, we love Hoyt. And it's this, it's a fascinating paper that I'll link to in the notes because it's very
3:29academic, but it's also the single most accommodating piece I've ever read about Slop. It loves Slop. It like genuine, it's like an in defense of Slop. It does seem like that. I read it pretty briefly and I, we'll talk about it more in depth, but it definitely just takes some things as a given in order to mount its defense of AI Slop. AI Slop has aesthetic value, cultural critics of history of initially dismissing low culture
4:00only to later admit its significance. This is very fucking stupid. I think it's like trying to use like the example like Kitsch in the paper is like an aesthetic form that eventually did have value. For example, like the famous dogs playing poker painting that people, you know, famously love and don't make fun of. Right. But that, so, and I get what they're saying. They're saying it has like a social function. It's fulfilling a need for more content.
4:31And it makes the argument that human beings want to make more and consume more, but also assumes that Slop is the actual thing filling that rather than just spraying so much Slop out there that it eventually does so. So, right. I think for me, it, the paper is, is, is engaging in a couple of like rhetorical tricks. One, I think is to try and accuse people who disagree with it subtly of like being elitist when any, anybody who does any social analysis of, of pop culture will take pop culture seriously
5:10in its analysis. But that doesn't mean like they'll argue that it, you know, matters, right? So the title works, but they'll, they'll try to extract what it is telling us about the people who produce and consume this content, the culture that allows or encourages this content to exist. And that could be a critical eye, it could be a supportive eye, but it tells us a lot about the culture that we're in, which is what sociologists do. And the idea that the paper is presenting that like, sure, like in, in culture broadly,
5:40we dismiss it. I don't think there are many academics who are quote, dismissing AI Slop. I think it is an object of quote unquote serious study because it says a lot about where we are, you know, for whatever reason, however it says it. And it's mainly just making the argument that like, if it's so bad, why does it exist? Which is the stupidest fucking argument you could make. I love that as well, because there is actually a valid discussion to be had here, which is, and this is going to sound mean, and this is dismissive.
6:11I don't think most people using Slop and making Slop should actually, should be allowed to create stuff. Like they don't want to make the effort to make something good. So they just, they're like, oh, every idea I have must be brought to life. I don't think that that should be the case. I don't think everyone should be able to have every idea. And it's interesting because it goes to like painstaking efforts to sort of like, uh, define what Slop is in that way. Right. Um, of, uh, it's asymmetrical by their own admission because of how easy it is to make
6:44and how fast you can kind of crank it out. Yeah. The examples that they use was, was kind of strange. I can remember if this was in this one of the, one of the responses, but it was like, well, Slop only matters to the person who makes it in the sense that it's like hyper-personalized or whatever. Right. So like the, it kind of discredits itself in that sense, because like, you know, being able to hyper-personalize your content doesn't necessarily matter. The amount that you can crank out doesn't matter if the whole point is to hyper-personalize it, I guess. You know what I mean?
7:15Yeah. It's also probably worth noting, uh, if, if you haven't heard of this paper, I don't know why you would, if you're listening to this, these are not a computer scientists. These are humanities people. So they're having a humanities dork conversation about this, you know, this subject. Well, it's also, it's customized for the user based on the AI Slop. And I must repeat, I don't get AI Slop on Facebook. I, it's either that I have someone in Facebook who is like, we can't let him see this. We can't let him see it. We must mask the Slop. Or there's someone in Facebook who's like, my man, I'm going to make sure you have Facebook
7:48premium where you don't have to be subjected. It's like, uh, in, uh, CS Lewis, the demon screw tape. You have your own screw tape demon. That's hand, hand sorting your algorithm for you to torment you. Yeah. But the Slop I see is bad. Like, it's just, it's Slop Slop. Like, it's not like someone has lovingly put together something using these tools, not to even say that that would be super valid, but it's not, the things I see are not the creation of someone thinking. It's a Grammy who's like, I'm going to make King Kong fight my, my husband.
8:24I, you, you, I think in order for this kind of personalization argument to really have any sway in terms of like the way we should primarily understand Slop's aesthetic or cultural
Volume versus personalization
8:36value is they would have to make the argument that most of the AI Slop people consume is, uh, curated or created by them with that personalization in mind instead of fed to them through an algorithm, like through social media, like Facebook or TikTok, right? Like if more people are consuming, uh, fruit, love Island, uh, then people are consuming like fan fiction where they get to insert themselves into the hunger games or whatever. Like if that's, if, if, if it's more fruit, love Island consumption, then self insert fanfic,
9:11then the personalization argument doesn't really matter. And it's really a conversation about, like you said earlier, the sheer volume of content that is being blasted onto these platforms. And the algorithmic biases that put this type of content in front of people and less, Hey, we get to create this thing. I, I don't know if anybody follows, uh, the YouTuber Sean, but at one point he says, this is the only, uh, human created, uh, endeavor that I would deny the title art.
9:44Um, and, and I think, I think we're at that point here. Um, but for the purposes of like talking about this content as content, um, we, we would have to, uh, separate out kind of our ability to personalize it versus what ends up getting fed to us through these systems. And that changes the conversation about the cultural or aesthetic value, because I think in this part is not unique to AI slop. The, the thing that AI has done has, it has turned down the quality.
10:17It is turned up the volume that's being produced. But what it effectively does is it recreates the scenario where people mistake aesthetics for message, right? Or, uh, they, they consume or intention that they want. Right. Uh, and so they're very enamored with the aesthetic of, you know, and, and by aesthetic, I don't just mean like the exact picture. Otherwise, you know, advertising with like gross looking food wouldn't work, but it looks like what a graphic, what you think a graphic designer will put together for an advertisement of food.
10:51And this reality show has the trappings of what we would call a reality show, which is like a very funny reflection on the fact that reality shows are scripted, right? Yes. That they're not really, uh, reality shows in the sense that, that we think of them anymore. Um, it very kind of like a somali chrome has consumed itself sort of thing. I'm probably mixing academic terms here, but, um, but like it feels like a reality show. And so I'm consuming it because I enjoy the feeling or the genre of reality in the same
11:24way that if you were like really into, I don't know, like 10 years ago, if you're really into like YA dystopic fiction, you'd start consuming a bunch of really shitty books because you like the hunger games and you like the feeling that you got reading it, a genuinely good series of books. And then you start reading like Divergent or whatever, and it has the trappings of it and you get, and you remove yourself further and further from like what we think of as what art transmits to us and what, what kind of effect it has, uh, and closer to the comfort
11:55of, of the familiarity of the form that we enjoy. Yeah. Yeah.
Can AI make art?
11:59And I think the, the thing is people, the, the vacuous argument of like, can AI make art? The only way I think I could ever consider AI art is if someone was just doing it to build, like they were doing a very, very, very specific thing on device with a real understanding of like the underlying weights of the model. Like it was, there's something, I think that that's where it really lies. Like if they actually have a hand over the technology, because if you think of it as like a thing with a billion brushes, if you're not the ones tweaking the brushes, then who gives a
12:30shit? And I, the paper even does make this kind of point that it, that this has the aesthetics of art, of what you expect art to be, but is not art itself. And I, and I think that I still get back to my point that there are lots of people that believe that they are denied access to making art because they're incapable of it. When what they actually mean is they don't want to learn. Yeah. And it may be more difficult for them to learn. Cause like, Caleb, you can play music. I can't play music.
13:01I'm not sitting here being like, I'm not allowed to play guitar. Yeah. I'm not allowed to be in the secondary of the Seattle Seahawks. It's not fair because I'm 5'10". Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It's like, yeah. I'm not allowed to play quarterback for the Raiders because somehow I'm not good enough. I mean, look at, look at the current guys. It's not a good time, fellas. It's just, it's interesting watching, and also kind of exhausting watching an academic look at this stuff because it suggests there's so much more thought behind all of it.
13:36Yeah. As in like the literal creation of the models and the image models themselves rather than just making things that can resemble other things. Yeah. I think that one of the problems in this often happens in my understanding of academia, mind you, I'm a college dropout. So like, take what I say with a grain of salt. But one thing that seems to hang up a lot of people in academia is when they take a bunch of arguments like at face value, which is like kind of the whole point of academia is to
14:10be a critical thinker and to take a look at underlying systems and what might be motivating things that are not on the surface. But you often get caught up. And I think this is exactly speaks to what you were saying earlier about people talking about like when they use the phrase democratizing access to art or whatever. Um, and it's like, look, I have, um, acquired somehow a bunch of Wes Anderson films and, uh, the really early stuff is low budget. Um, what, and it, there was not a ton of barrier to access for Wes Anderson to start putting
14:45together some truly remarkable art. And through that, he ended up getting access to more resources and all that. And, and certainly we're not in a meritocratic system when it comes to rewarding, you know, art, but in the same way that, you know, I strongly believe that there should be democratic access to the tools, the materials that we use to make, um, you know, some of our, our greatest works of art. I also think that the people making the argument, they're not actually honestly making the argument. We have to understand that they're not making good faith because when you take a look at
15:18to people who are like tweeting out, um, or putting together videos about like, Hey, we're going to replace film studios with AI or whatever. And, and you see this like shitty movie that like, there's like three heads and whatever. Um, you, they, you, they never answer the question of what they're attempting to communicate, like what, uh, message value their film has. Right. A lot of times it's just meme slop, right? Where they, where they paste together a bunch of memes and, and want everyone to jump on
15:53like reference humor. Like we're all living in a family guy episode or something. Yeah. And, and there's nothing that they're trying to say. And so it's very, by virtue of the fact that we know that there's nothing they're trying to say. We also know that their arguments about democratizing art are, are bullshit. They don't care about that because they don't actually care about art. They care about monetizing content. Healthcare can feel complicated.
16:29That's why Optum uses technology to connect the people and processes that make healthcare easier, more affordable, and more effective. We're making it clearer for you to know exactly what your benefits cover and to help you better manage your health. We're coordinating care between your doctors and your technology. We believe better, simpler healthcare is always possible. That's healthy optimism. That's Optum. Visit Optum.com to learn more. What if you could have even more and more and more help to pursue your goals?
17:00At LPL Financial, we offer more ways for advisors and their clients to thrive. So what if you could? Paid advertisement investing involves risk, including potential loss of principal. LPL Financial LLC member FINRA SIPC. Hey, it's Kelly Rowland. You may not know this, but I have eczema, so I get how it can steal your time. But why let eczema take over when you can talk to your doctor about ebglis? Ebglis Lubrikizumab LBKZ, a 250 milligram per two milliliter injection, is a prescription medicine used to treat adults and children 12 years of age and older who weigh at least 88
17:33pounds or 40 kilograms with moderate to severe eczema. Also called atopic dermatitis that is not well controlled with prescription therapies used on the skin or topicals or who cannot use topical therapies. Ebglis can be used with or without topical corticosteroids. Don't use if you are allergic to ebglis. Allergic reactions can occur that can be severe. Eye problems can occur. Tell your doctor if you have new or worsening eye problems. You should not receive a live vaccine when treated with ebglis. Before starting ebglis, tell your doctor if you have a parasitic infection. Paid partnership with Lilly. Respect your time. Ask your doctor about ebglis and visit ebglis.com or call 1-800-LILLY-RX or 1-800-545-5979.
18:11No data, no AI. It's just that simple. Until now, the data your AI depends on has been trapped behind ever-increasing cloud fees. Wasabi created hot cloud storage and is redefining cloud storage for the AI era, delivering simple, predictable cloud storage for AI, analytics, media, and more. Your data is free to move, fast to access, and ready when your AI needs it, giving your business a competitive advantage. When your data moves freely, innovation moves faster, giving you the freedom to build, train, and do more with your data. Hidden fees add up fast as AI workloads grow.
18:44Wasabi's flat pricing eliminates all of it. One rate, no surprises. With global scale, enterprise performance, and predictable pricing, Wasabi helps organizations focus on innovation instead of cloud bills. Companies that are paying more in fees than in actual storage costs can fall behind. Don't let it happen. When your AI needs your data and you have a budget to meet, get Wasabi. Learn more and try now for free at wasabi.com. Wasabi, the AI storage cloud. Proud partner of the iHeart Podcast Network. Yes, they want to make a job-making content.
19:19That really, that's actually a really good way of putting anyone who says democratizing art is just saying, I want to be able to become an influence. I want to get paid for pressing buttons on the computer. Yeah.
Italian brain rot and memes
19:29I will say this. I think that there's an almost neo-Dadaist quality to some of the Italian brain rot stuff specifically. And if you don't know what that is, God bless you. There's sort of like- It's like tun-tun-tun-sacur and all that. When you have just like some horror, some broccoli-haired kid showing it to a man clearly who's homeless and experiencing mental distress. Truly awful videos. Yeah. Anyway. They are, but the thing is, is like, they, so, so those came where they're born out of like the shrimp Jesus era of like early, you know, stuff that was like, okay, this is just
20:03really stupid. And so a lot of what happens is these kids kind of take this and they're making fun of sort of just like the tech industry in general by making these characters. But to your point, Arif, like the second that they do that, like someone else will just take it and monetize it. Like you, you'll see, you know, we, we went into a sort of a genealogy of this with the fine folks of internet today, Ricky and Elliot on my show. It was a lot of fun, but the second that the, you know, the, you get some of this stuff that's like, okay, this is something that people are kind of sort of claiming through
20:33memes. Then in like farmer's markets, pop-ups, there's like trading cards of Italian brain rounds. Like, okay, well, you know, clearly there's the grift is just nonstop. Yeah. And it's the whole, and a lot of that as well as like the Italian brain rot meme. LLMs are mostly just playing on the oldest form of humor, which is funny words. The actual art itself is not really the funny part. And it's, it's frustrating as well, because I'm sure there is someone making art with LLMs,
21:05but that is not the same as AIR. And they are being drowned out by these freaks. I guess I'd call them just because I don't, like, I'm not even sure I'm comfortable saying that LLMs can make art. Like actually I'm taking a step back now because it's so hard for you to have enough act, because it gets back to the artist thing. It's for you to be able to do that, you would actually have to be able to train and understand the LLM on a technical level. So you're basically a mathematician, software engineer, what have you, which at this point
21:36you could have just learned to paint or something or draw. Yeah. It's just basically the same as that now. And it's just the fact that this debate exists, pisses me off as well, because it, even through like cutting it up in the way this paper does, it legitimizes it. It treats it on the level of kitsch because even the shittiest looking reality TV show you've ever seen, even the worst Hallmark movie still has probably a first and second AD. Definitely as a director of photography, definitely has a producer or two, definitely has runners
22:07the bunch of people on set, even if they're doing it in a way where they don't allow the people to sleep or whatever, like how all reality TV shows work, there is actual real intention going on. Yeah. Yeah. And I think to kind of dig at the existence of what we would call AI generated art, I think that there are ways for artists to, especially like you mentioned, like someone who's deeply invested in CS and machine learning and modifying the weights and stuff like that to produce like
22:39resistive art or art that like in the same way that pop art used materials that were not often thought of as like artistic materials or depicted subjects that were not, you know, traditional subjects of art and stuff like that. Like there are ways that you can, and I'm thinking of like one of the examples of people like to, to go all the way back to when conservatives used to complain about modern art a bunch. Uh, one of the, one of the things that they would make fun of is the urinal, um, that was genuinely a very impactful piece of art specifically because it had opened itself up to the kind
23:13of ridicule. That's what it was attempting to do about like the nature of art and what we consider art. And you could do something somewhat similar with, um, AI art so long as you do it with like a bunch of intentionality and there was an attempt to kind of interrogate the way our, um, obsessions may be the wrong word, but the proliferation of AI art, um, and AI content throughout like our day-to-day life.
Real artists and AI workflows
23:41Like there's something you can do about that, that would probably be an interesting art piece, but you have to do it with a lot of intention and it's always really difficult to do something like that without it being interpreted in a different way. And so it would take a really strong artist to be able to do that effectively, but it is possible. But I just think that the parameters for something like that are fairly narrow. Have you guys, uh, either of you seen, there is a creator on Instagram whose name escapes me, but it started out kind of as these things go, one person that makes it and then a million
24:12other copycats are like versions of it pop up, but it's like the, it's like this kid teams up with Tung Tung to like destroy the AI bubble. And then, oh yeah. Yeah. And then, then Tung Tung turns into dust, like Thanos and he starts crying. It's actually like, you know, it's literally based on a Jojo's Bizarre Adventure bit. When Avdol dies, I just realized I spoiled Jojo. I'm sorry, anyone, but it's like, that's literally based on a very specific Jojo's bit. Anyway. Yes. I know the thing, but keep going. I thought that was very, that was just my point.
24:44It's like, that was actually kind of funny. And, you know, that's a reference to something made by a human being where the art is a reference rather than, well, and that part of that creator specifically also made that, you know what I mean? Tung Tung, it wasn't his creation, but he made a video with Tung Tung in it. You know what I mean? There was like, there was like hand-drawn animation in his own voice acting that made it good. Right. Yeah. And that's the thing. And it always comes back to, oh, a human being did something. And people will argue, oh, what are you talking about? Well, it's a human being should just be able to type a prompt in and it's just as valid
25:17to do that. No, no, it's not. Shut the fuck up.
25:20We do not consider the people who commissioned artists during the Renaissance to be the artists who produced those paintings, right? Like, I think that that's a ridiculous argument to argue that the patron is the artist. Yeah. Like, if someone painted my house, I don't think that, I wouldn't be like, I painted my house. I might say I have my house painted. I don't know. Yeah. And like, sometimes people will like use that language in ways that are generally understood. Like, hey, I renovated my house.
25:51I think most people would understand that if I'm not a contractor, they know me to be a contractor. I probably hired contractors to do that, but that's like within the confines of how that language is used. And that's it. But when people say I made this and they point to a piece of art or a piece of content, the understanding is that you are responsible for its creation by having a hand in how it was made as opposed to commissioning it. And I think that that we should keep that divide. I think we should very much make sure that we don't make this mistake of confusing the
26:22patron for the artist. Well, I think that this is, it gets back to the other things that like, oh, we should tolerate AI writing. Oh, we should tolerate AI coding at scale. We should, we should do all of these things because it ultimately comes down to these people want to crush the meaning out of creation of anything. They want it to be about the output, only the output, and you must lower your standards for output so that they can shoulder barge themselves in with whatever form of crap they
26:52swill. I just, I have like the, also, I mean, if you ever need to really just believe that all of this stuff should burn, I recommend going to r slash grok, which is the worst community of people alive. I would say it is people using r slash grok. These members just use grok to generate porno. Yeah. And I'm just picking a random headline. I'm just going to read it in the tone. I think it's tell me exactly what I'm paying 30 bucks a month for every damn thing.
27:25I try as moderate every damn thing. And I'm not even doing SFW clip selling. So tell me exactly what I'm paying $30 for. What am I getting? Tell me exactly. Hey, what am I getting for $30? That is just one sentence. And it's just guys trying to-
Communities generating weird images
27:38It's literally an entire community of people helping each other trick the computer into seeing a nipple. I mean, that is the whole subject. It really, or making the single worst like space art you've ever seen. It will be like a Roman soldier flying through space, throwing a spear at a space station. Another great one I'm just going to read is, how is moderation compared to yeast today? I saw some complaint today. It's just like people who can barely speak English having conversations about why they
28:09can't generate insanely horrifying images. I was about to say, I wonder if some of the value is, or some of the joy, I guess is one word, is it comes from getting around the moderation and tricking it to do what you want. And probably that's still the case because it's trivially fairly easy to get, to find your way to like a jailbroken text generation for sure, and then probably image generation as well.
28:39But then, as you're reading out the headlines, I realize, no, actually, that would be quite the task for these people. They are stuck in Grok. They don't know how to find the jailbroken LLM, and that's fine. I'm glad that they're having this trouble. Also, just another, this is a fairly obvious one, is most artists I've met are very open to new ideas. Like, they're very open to new concepts. They're like, oh, that could be interesting. It's why, by the way, I have some affordance for the weird Natasha Lyonne thing that she
29:15said about, it's ripping off Casey Kagawa, a friend of the show, where she said that David Lynch liked AI. It's like, yeah, she probably was like, what do you think of anyone? Ah, it sounds interesting. Wow. And they hadn't actually used it. And I think most artists are curious. He saw Shroom Jesus and was like, okay. Somebody's hell, right? I've dreamed of this guy. And the thing is, but past the immediate point of hearing about it, I've never met an artist
29:46who's used AI and then gone, oh, wow. I've met a lot of artists who have said, I am horrified. Like, just like, I find this genuinely, the things it creates are horrible to look at. Because there's this weird kind of like, I realize tinny doesn't sound right for something you're looking at, but it really just has this weird echoing feeling to it. I've just never been able to get my head around. But it's like my mate Jerry Willis out in Greenpoint. He's a great artist. The idea of AI seems to offend him.
30:17Just like every artist I talk to, a defense, like Arthur Adams, a great comic book artist. Never seen him pick up AI. In fact, I've yet to meet an artist who's picked it up. Like, just straight up. No working artist I've ever met has been like, I'm going to adopt AI into my workflows, let alone into my artwork. And it's just, it's stark.
Darren Aronofsky and AI videos
30:39There's Darren Aronofsky who made that. I don't know if you guys saw that. Yeah, I'm saying artists. But it's also not noted, however, that like, he did that, but then you look back at his career, and like shot for shot, so much of it is stolen from like Perfect Blue and other Japanese animations and stuff like that. It's like, okay, like guys like Aronofsky, who I used to, unfortunately, there's a couple of movies that I like, and it's like, oh, this actually makes sense. This guy just steals stuff that he would like, this kind of thing. Well, also, have you seen the clips of the Darren Aronofsky, George Washington stuff?
31:12Yes. It is. Oh my God. I am going to link to this in the YouTube, the YouTube link. It's so fucking funny just watching like when they're handing out, I didn't learn American history, sorry. The thing that started the American Revolution, there's a name of a document, I don't know. But anyway, if you're looking at the document when they're handing it out to people, the text changes as they hand it, the shape of George Washington. It's great. And it's just, you watch it and you're like, what I don't get is how they publish this.
31:45Like how they looked at this and went fucking banger, ship it. Somebody was like, what if we did the American Revolution, but it gave you the same feeling as having a dream when you're punching underwater for 30 minutes?
31:57What if you watch something that made you feel like you were telling a lie?
32:04Just this really horrible, and it looked, you'll notice that no shot stays for more than a few seconds. There was that, I mentioned this in the previous episode, there was a film that was made with AI that they said showed at Cannes, and people were like, oh, it was at the Cannes Film Festival. It was like, no, it wasn't. Nope. It was aired outside of the film festival. They aired it in the city during the film festival. Which is great, because all the media fell for it. They fell for it because no one thinks, but that's the AI bubble at this point.
32:37It's just like misreading headlines and hoping no one notices.
32:45Health care can feel complicated. That's why Optum uses technology to connect the people and processes that make health care easier, more affordable, and more effective. We're making it clearer for you to know exactly what your benefits cover. And to help you better manage your health, we're coordinating care between your doctors and your technology. We believe better, simpler health care is always possible.
33:15That's healthy optimism. That's Optum. Visit Optum.com to learn more. What if you could have even more and more and more help to pursue your goals? At LPL Financial, we offer more ways for advisors and their clients to thrive. So, what if you could? Paid advertisement investing involves risk, including potential loss of principal. LPL Financial LLC member FINRA SIPC. Hey, it's Kelly Rowland. You may not know this, but I have eczema. So I get how it can steal your time. But why let eczema take over when you can talk to your doctor about ebglis?
33:48Ebglis Lubrikizumab LBKZ, a 250 milligram per two milliliter injection, is a prescription medicine used to treat adults and children 12 years of age and older who weigh at least 88 pounds or 40 kilograms with moderate to severe eczema. Also called atopic dermatitis that is not well controlled with prescription therapies used on the skin or topicals or who cannot use topical therapies, ebglis can be used with or without topical corticosteroids. Don't use if you are allergic to ebglis. Allergic reactions can occur that can be severe. Eye problems can occur. Tell your doctor if you have new or worsening eye problems.
34:19You should not receive a live vaccine when treated with ebglis. Before starting ebglis, tell your doctor if you have a parasitic infection. Paid partnership with Lilly. Respect your time. Ask your doctor about ebglis and visit ebglis.com or call 1-800-LILLY-RX or 1-800-545-5979. No data, no AI. It's just that simple. Until now, the data your AI depends on has been trapped behind ever-increasing cloud fees. Wasabi created hot cloud storage and is redefining cloud storage for the AI era, delivering simple,
34:50predictable cloud storage for AI, analytics, media, and more. Your data is free to move, fast to access, and ready when your AI needs it, giving your business a competitive advantage. When your data moves freely, innovation moves faster, giving you the freedom to build, train, and do more with your data. Hidden fees add up fast as AI workloads grow. Wasabi's flat pricing eliminates all of it. One rate, no surprises. With global scale, enterprise performance, and predictable pricing, Wasabi helps organizations focus on innovation instead of cloud bills.
35:21Companies that are paying more in fees than in actual storage costs can fall behind. Don't let it happen. When your AI needs your data and you have a budget to meet, get Wasabi. Learn more and try now for free at wasabi.com. Wasabi, the AI storage cloud. Proud partner of the iHeart Podcast Network.
Learning and the friction of creation
35:41Back to the paper. This isn't even an elitist thing. I actually have respect for people who can put out shit that sucks again and again, and they get iteratively better. And I'm talking about myself. If you go and read my 2019 stuff, it was rough. It was not great. I thought this was about Tommy Wiseau. Tommy Wiseau has only got better with time. But it's also watching directors get better. Watching someone find the way to articulate their ideas is kind of the beauty of art.
36:11There was someone who, I'm sure it was ripped off of TikTok, but there was someone who posted on Twitter this video of a guy who just kept drawing every year. And it started out with his art looking like shit. Like it just, it didn't. But over the years, you saw it tightening up, tightening up, tightening up. And the problem is, I think that, to be clear, no one enjoys that. No one enjoys getting better at anything. Perhaps you do when you get your head into it, when you get a bit of the momentum under you. But yeah, getting better at stuff sucks, especially when you don't take to it naturally.
36:43And I mean, human beings will take any friction they can reduce. But this is, the friction that's being reduced here is the art. Like just the actual thing. The sense of accomplishment that you get from art is like overcoming the fact that you suck at it, right? We were talking about music earlier. It's like, when I make something, you know, what I always really love is because I do all the music for my show and I'll throw up outro music and stuff like that when I've written something.
37:14And I love when people ask me like, oh, how did you do this thing? And it's like, well, that gives me a sense of accomplishment because it was the process of learning how to do something I previously didn't know how to do in the stride that it took to get there, to learn a new skill or a new subset of skills or whatever, right? That's the whole point. If you take that out of it, what's left? You know what I mean? Say whatever you will to bring this back to a football thing. Sorry, everybody. But Russell Wilson had that quote where you got to love the process and say what you will about him. But he was cooking with that. No, that's true. Yeah.
Content creators versus artists
37:45One of the, so Ed, when you were talking about how like there were no artists that you know that have like embraced AI, I was thinking of exactly a perfect example of this that separates someone who's a content creator from an artist. Caleb, you probably know this name. You know, Shadiversity, the YouTuber? I do. Yeah. So he, there was like, don't worry about it. Don't, don't, don't. Yeah, he's, uh, he, he, he arrived too late in the YouTube world for Gamergate, but he
38:15would have been a Gamergater. He's essentially that now, but for like wokeness and DEI in like Mario. Um. Oh, good. But, uh, he was originally just like this, I accurately described him. Uh, he originally was like meant to be an educational YouTuber that like taught you how like sword fighting worked. It turned out like all of it was BS, but, uh, he gained, he gained a lot of, uh, a huge following out of, out of doing content around, uh, medieval realism.
38:45Um, and he started posting pretty recently after he started ranting about like wokeness and DEI and stuff, he started posting, um, AI art that he had commissioned, right? That he had had, uh, mid journey generate and a bunch of people were appropriately mad. And he was like, well, actually you guys don't understand. I'm a trained artist. And the really funny thing is his brother, it turns out, I didn't know this and I wish I remembered his name is somehow an even more popular YouTuber than him with like 2 million
39:16subscribers who is a trained artist and is a substantially better artist than him. And they don't talk to each other, which is even funnier. Um, and go on. Yeah. And so like he, he describes why him being an artist, uh, allows him to improve the AI generation. So what he does is he asks it to generate a really sexy picture of like Supergirl. And, and, and then this picture with like two different sons in the background, but on
39:47earth of Supergirl gets generated. She has an 11 pack. Yeah, exactly. And it's a very bad picture. And he's like, well, as an artist, I understand proportions. So he puts it in the Photoshop, screws around with it, uploads it back to mid journey and was like, Hey, so I did a bunch of shit in Photoshop. Can you incorporate my changes? And then mid journey does it and makes it worse again. Um, and he's like, yeah, I go through this process. It takes me hours and hours and hours to do it. I put a lot of time into it and it's my artist training that allows me to produce this. And it's just the shittiest image in the world.
40:18Um, yeah. And, and, and like real artists, there's a bunch of really great YouTube videos about real artists, like breaking down what he does, what his misunderstandings are and like why that doesn't make sense. And also like what you, you're in mid journey, just ask it to make the changes that you're spending hours in Photoshop. You're doing this to show off that you're spending time, which ruins the point of this AI shit anyway. The craziest thing, but like, yeah, a content creator obsessed with creative content loves AI. His artist brother, who he is not on speaking terms with despises it.
40:50Well, this is, uh, this reminds me of something that goes to a, it's a greater term that I found from this guy called Rob Sloan. Um, I don't know who this guy is. He, he's, uh, seems like a decent guy, a writer maybe, but he has this term called Jarvising, which refers to how AI is really good at creating a thing that you work on, like a tooling system that you're constantly dicking around with. You're constantly tweaking. You're constantly messing with because, and this is a paraphrase of atomic habits, which I mean, pretty good book, kind of a dickhead, the guy, but makes this point of there is
41:25a way to spend a lot of time doing nothing, but feeling real productive. And I think these models really give it to you, especially with like nano banana, one of the worst things to ever this, just the worst names of anything in that you can be like computer, make the boobie bigger computer, make the eyes red computer, give her a sword. And you feel like you're doing something, even though you are not like, you could not make that move yourself. And indeed you are not actually intentionally tweaking exactly what you're talking about
41:55because I don't know, describing what you're doing in words is not the same as actually physically doing something. And people will say, oh, there are all sorts of automations. We don't totally know what's happening in the background. Art isn't one of those things where that's okay though. Like art, it's not something where like not really knowing why you're doing stuff. That's not really part of the picture, at least when it's just, when the actual process of doing, because to be clear, yeah, there are people who probably blindfolded themselves and painted.
42:26Your hand is still fucking moving or they throw something down a wall or something. Yeah. I think for a lot of these like human endeavors that are so difficult and complex to pick up that by the time you see the finished product, it's very opaque how to get there. I think, and obviously I'm like very football minded, but like actually film may be a better example. There are a lot of directors who will break the traditional rules of film that you might get taught in your first year at film school about like, you know, composition and the
42:59rule of thirds and like guiding lines and stuff like that. And when you watch like one of these directors, one of these outstanding directors, they'll break those rules, right? And, and somebody who's not invested in or ensconced in that world of film analysis or is an artist might conclude, oh, the rules don't matter when really what we've learned is that a lot of these directors only break these rules because they know what the rule
43:30is there for, why they learned it and how they spent a lot of time. You have to understand the box to think outside or to work outside. Exactly. It's like a musician playing accidental notes or whatever, right? If you're playing, you know what you play out of your key. Half of my bit is that I do deep financial analysis, but I say fucking shit. And I, I speak in a lot, I say no IT loads, refuse, come dump and stuff like that. Like you generally don't, you generally don't say stuff. I know it's so funny. They gave me a show, but it's just, but it's good because it's good because I'm working
44:07within the boundaries. Cause it's not entirely me saying stuff like that. It's just those pop up and you go, oh, what a surprise. And then we go back to the analysis. It's the different way of doing, still having a purpose. I mean, Lynch, I just, I, a couple months ago, I watched Twin Peaks to return tons of things that break the rules in that, but they work because they were done with intention. He actually knew what he was doing. Every bit was done with intention. Yeah. And you know what the impact is of breaking this particular rule in this particular way. You know it even intuitively when you're a masterful enough, whatever.
44:38Right. And like, you know, the example in football I was going to use is like these quarterbacks that like break traditional rules of quarterbacking, um, do so because they know what those rules are. They can accomplish things within the lines and then they go outside of it. Like Patrick Mahomes is an extremely good traditional quarterback. Sorry. I know both of you hate him. Yeah. This is still going to be great for Caleb. But, but the way that he breaks the traditional rules of quarterbacking infuriates people who teach high schoolers how to play football, but works for him because he can play really
45:10well within the confines of the system. And then he breaks those rules because it'll work in that particular moment to accomplish a specific goal that he wouldn't have been able to do within traditional football. But like, just like a bunch of kids learned how to shoot 26 foot threes from Steph Curry or scramble and do insane stuff from Patrick Mahomes. It's not actually helping you to, to try and replicate that end process of the rule breaking. It is much better to learn what those rules are so that when you have the capability to break those rules, you know what you're doing, what you're sacrificing and what you're accomplishing.
45:40Yeah. And I mean, people are really, the people really don't like the sports stuff. So I'm going to keep going. Yeah. But also, I didn't say anything because not, not the time, right? Oh, I don't give a shit. Oh, these people would take what I give them. I like that. I love them, but they will enjoy my show on my terms. But Steph Curry, for example, he's not just shooting threes arbitrarily from the middle of the core. He has a proficient understanding of how defensive formations might look. He understands what, what his own body can do. There is a fundamental understanding of the structure of humanity and human beings and
46:13basketball players and the rules of the NBA and so on and so forth that allows him to break those rules. These LLMs when creating anything, art, words, whatever, don't understand rules. They, they may understand consistencies within stuff. Yeah. They understand relationships as they've been like historically defined through averages of text. Yeah. But they don't understand why decisions are made, just that the decisions have been made, which I think is significant and also is what ultimately makes creating anything frustrating.
46:47Like I think that the frustrated, like one, like for example, when I began this show, I could not read a balance sheet. I had never learned. I found every time I looked at one, I felt like my head was full of sand and I eventually just with the help of Matt Hughes broke through it and I learned and actually being able to understand these nuances with, and not from a traditional finance background actually allowed me to do some really interesting shit because I don't come into it with the predispositions of the system. Nevertheless, the process of learning that stuff was what made me good.
47:18It wasn't anything to do with anything other than having built this, having understood the system, built my own system, and then doing things with that knowledge and the process. This is kind of a fucked up point, I realize, but it's very, it's very much about actually doing stuff to get to a point. And I, to be clear, I get it. Like learning is fucking annoying. Like, I don't, I don't think it, like, it's not like fun sometimes when you, especially when you don't understand something, it's very frustrating when you sit there and you
47:50look at a concept, you're like, I, what do we do? I don't get it. And smashing your head against it sucks. The same with making your annoying meat suit do stuff. Make it do thing that you want it to do. When you can't make it do the thing that feels so crystal clear in your head. But that is creation, Jesus Christ. Yeah. Yeah.
Sign off and wrap up
48:10Well, you know what? I think that's actually a good point to wrap us up at. Where can people find you, find fellas? Uh, you can find me on Twitter at ArifasanNFL, on bluesky at arif.bsky.social, uh, and my newsletter, uh, whytheleft.football, where I talk about, sometimes I talk about football, but a lot of times I talk about this shit. And Caleb? Uh, you can find me at birdrespector.bsky.social or killthecomputer.com.
48:40Uh, if you are interested in sort of like more of the first half of the discussion we were having, uh, that's kind of what we do over there. And Kill the Computer was, of course, the actual progenitor of OpenAI, of OpenAI, Jesus Christ, of Better Offline. They're going to have my ass in the comments for that. It's been a long week, fellas. It's actually genuinely Robert Evans heard me on Kill the Computer, and that's how he found me, and not OpenAI, Jesus Christ. They're going to really get me for this. If we created OpenAI, they would be killed. You created OpenAI. Yeah, no, they really would have our ass for that.
49:12Everyone, thank you so much for listening. I'll be back with the monologue this week, of course. Thank you for listening to Better Offline. I'm Ed Zitron. Good night.
49:28Thank you for listening to Better Offline. The editor and composer of the Better Offline theme song is Matt Ossowski. You can check out more of his music and audio projects at mattosowski.com. M-A-T-T-O-S-O-W-S-K-I.com. You can email me at ez at betteroffline.com or visit betteroffline.com to find more podcast links and, of course, my newsletter. I also really recommend you go to chat.wheresyoured.at to visit the Discord and go to r slash betteroffline to check out our Reddit. Thank you so much for listening.
50:00Better Offline is a production of Cool Zone Media. For more from Cool Zone Media, visit our website, coolzonemedia.com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Health care can feel complicated.
50:35That's why Optum uses technology to connect the people and processes that make health care easier, more affordable, and more effective. We're making it clearer for you to know exactly what your benefits cover. And to help you better manage your health, we're coordinating care between your doctors and your technology. We believe better, simpler health care is always possible. That's healthy optimism. That's Optum. Visit optum.com to learn more. What if you could make that stop?
51:07With LPL Financial, we remove the things holding you back and provide the services to help push you forward. If you're a financial advisor, what if you could have more freedom, but also more support? Ready to invest? What if you could have an advisor that really understood you? When it comes to your finances, your business, your future, at LPL Financial, we believe the only question should be, what if you could? Pit advertisement, Anna Kendrick is not a client of LPL Financial LLC and receives compensation to promote LPL. Investing involves risk, including potential loss of principal LPL Financial LLC member FINRA SIPC. Hey, it's Kelly Rowland.
51:37You may not know this, but I have eczema, so I get how it can steal your time. But why let eczema take over when you can talk to your doctor about ebglis? Ebglis Lubricizumab LBKZ, a 250 milligram per two milliliter injection, is a prescription medicine used to treat adults and children 12 years of age and older who weigh at least 88 pounds or 40 kilograms with moderate to severe eczema, also called atopic dermatitis, that is not well controlled with prescription therapies used on the skin or topicals or who cannot use topical therapies. Ebglis can be used with or without topical corticosteroids.
52:09Don't use if you are allergic to ebglis. Allergic reactions can occur that can be severe. Eye problems can occur. Tell your doctor if you have new or worsening eye problems. You should not receive a live vaccine when treated with ebglis. Before starting ebglis, tell your doctor if you have a parasitic infection. Paid partnership with Lilly. Respect your time. Ask your doctor about ebglis and visit ebglis.com or call 1-800-LILLY-RX or 1-800-545-5979. Working as a dedicated fidelity advisor, I always ask, what's important to you?
52:40A look at those priorities and goals alongside your full financial picture to build a comprehensive plan designed to help grow and protect your wealth. With proactive portfolio insights and an eye on taxes, I'm here to help you make the most of your money. I'm Laura Maxwell, and I'm a dedicated fidelity advisor. Learn more at fidelity.com slash wealth. Investment minimums apply. Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC, member NYSE SIPC. This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed Human.